Is it Wrong to Run with Bulls?
Today is the last day of of the festivals of San Fermin. The families are out in force, enjoying the traditional events of dancing giants, rural Basque sports and typical jotas (songs from Navarra). The daytime San Fermin is such a contrast to the violence and risk of the bull runs and bullfights and the excesses of the nocturnal fiestas. I’m finally finding time to reflect on what this long week has been. In particular, I’ve now experienced the running of the bulls, from a runner’s point of view, twice. Today I ran again.
After the quick bull run, I read an email from a concerned friend in which she repeatedly asks some of the important questions. Kara’s opinions frame the issue as a moral one – especially in light of the recent death of Daniel Jimeno Romero. So, I decided to quote the well-written email at length, as well as investigate some other opinions. Leaving aside the subject of bullfighting, here’s the main question.
Is the Running of the Bulls event wrong?
My friend Kara’s answer is “Yes, the event is wrong.” My answer is, “No.” She writes:
My initial reaction to the first death of San Fermin was immediate condemnation of the whole event. I wouldn’t say that I felt aversion to the festival as much as confusion over how it all could be worth the ultimate sacrifice. After some thought, however, my initial condemnation stands. There are various reasons for this stance, and I am fully aware that passing judgment on an event that I have not attended and that is far older than I am is a bit arrogant, but I think that I have given the situation serious and informed consideration–at the least as much as possible in my circumstance.
Is a the rush of adrenaline, the sense of adventure and danger worth the risk and possible extinguishing of even one human life? After much thought and consideration, I came to simple and unqualified answer–no.
Why was his life cut short? Why did his family, the city, the country, and the world lose him? Is the city of Pamplona, or even the country of Spain, better for the deaths and injuries that occur at the festival every year? Do the men and women that run each year have the right to put their lives in danger for the cause of tradition and celebration? Side note: I do not question the danger of the event because various sources, including yourself, have expressed the certain amount of luck involved in running with wild animals over which you have no control. Ian Usher said it best during your interview, almost to the point of admitting that a certain amount of naivete, bordering on stupidity is needed:“Now, I should have done it when I was in my early twenties, when you think you’re invincible and nothing scares you. I’m now forty-five I’ve got a lot more common sense and a lot more, sort of self-preservation. It scares me because unlike skydiving, where you have a fair amount of control over the equipment and timing, here it seems to be completely out of your hands. You go, and it’s a lottery out there. You can be as sensible, safe and sober as you want but things can still go horribly wrong. That’s why it scares me, because really I don’t see that I have a lot of control over what happens.”
But, back to my question. Do individuals have the right to put their own lives in severe danger (and there are degrees of danger to be sure) for whatever fancy crosses their mind? One can argue both ways, but as I believe there is a higher purpose to life and that the gift of life is sacred and worth preserving, I do not think that individuals have that right… I believe that by participating in something like the running of the bulls (skydiving, bungee jumping, etc.) one is acting in a selfish and morally reprehensible way, ignoring the true beauty and power of life that can so easily be seen through various means and need not be seen only in stark contrast with death or the possibility of such.
I will not run because I am capable of valuing life by its own merits and not simply through the possible loss of it, and though this may sound arrogant, I am not so selfish as to take myself out of this world knowing that I can affect it and, possibly, make it a better place for even one person to live in.
Kara’s opinion condemns all high-risk sports – especially risk of the 1500-pound-horned caliber. I don’t know if I can make a moral case for the Running of the Bulls, but I will offer my experience and some thoughts.
From talking to people here in Pamplona (visitors and locals), I’ve come to understand that many of them run with the bulls as a way of self-discovery. It’s a natural and known phenomenon that human males like the thrill of taking risks. Whether this has some biological, evolutionary purpose is beyond me, but I can speculate that perhaps the thrill of testing limits and flirting with danger increases risk tolerance, and thus, survival, when extreme daring is necessary. Courage is an admirable virtue, and it needs to be tested in order to be strengthened. I don’t think that the majority of participants in this event are mindless thrill-seekers. Believe me, (unless you’re drunk or crazy) you KNOW the risk involved. This event breathes danger and fear. The bulls come thundering through the crowd of running people who look frail in comparison to the large, muscular animals. And, of course, it’s exhilarating to be alive afterwards. Strangers hug and raise their hands triumphantly to the sky and the crowd in the stadium goes wild as the bulls and runners enter the bull ring. Something that feels so good and is so popular – can it be all bad? The answer I’ve come to is that there are simply different ways to live life, and that’s beautiful. I run with the bulls because I want to – and because I believe that the level of risk to which I’m exposing myself is acceptably proportional to what I think I’ll out of it – in terms of exhilaration and self-knowledge.
For some people, the experience of risk is living life to the fullest that they know. There are people that would consider death-by-bull to be preferable to a quiet disease. And there are some people who suddenly become more risk averse. I talked to one local man who ran all 8 bull runs every year for 15 years – then he had children and gave it up cold turkey. He won’t even watch the event live anymore.
A brief search of blogs on the topic resulted in some similar opinions. Many people write off the whole event as sheer stupidity.
WaltSense insists the event was started by a drunk dare.
A. Lowhorn on TheBrownTweedSociety writes: “I say to Spain—how many more of these stupid, stupid men have to die before you address this crisis?”
And Ernest Hemingway boldly states: “Auto racing, bull fighting, and mountain climbing are the only real sports … all others are games.”
Some final questions: Should we outlaw other sports that happen to have many injuries and sometimes result in the ultimate sacrifice? Car racing? Motorcycles? Boxing? American football? Whitewater rafting?
A final fact: only 15 people have died as a direct result of the bull-gorings in the past 100 years. Granted, a handful of other deaths have resulted from the run, not involving bulls.
I’ll close with a good comment quoted in this NYTimes blog post, written by somebody who understands that this tradition is something to be experienced before it can accurately be judged:
“But, this is not my culture, though my husband and children are Spanish and I think it is short sighted to point fingers at a tradition that has been around for centuries and for example, is far more environmentally friendly than oh, Nascar. But I did not post to get into the ethics of bullfighting.
The guy that was killed was in Pamplona from Madrid with his parents and girlfriend and maybe, just maybe, before you put up such nasty and mean spirited comment about “another idiot down” you might think of him and his family. I am embarrassed at my fellow Americans cruelty. Que descanse en paz, Daniel.”
Posted in the category 1. 2 comments »
Photos by 
